Friday, October 6, 2017

My Experience With... Courageous (the novel)



This is not the first time I’ve written anything about the Kendrick Brothers. In fact, here are links to the series: 


My favorite movie of the original Kendrick Brothers’ quintilogy is Courageous, hands down. It has it all: 5 distinct protagonists, an excellent supporting cast, great morals, and an awesome mixture of drama and comedy. Well, Randy Alcorn (a very popular Christian author) apparently saw it and decided to ramp it up to 1000. This is Courageous, the novel.

Now, if you’ve seen the movie or read my blog post (this was back when I put spoilers in my posts), you should know that the overall story arcs are the same. You have 5 main characters with different walks of life and perspectives about fatherhood. Four of them work together on the police force, and the fifth met them through a divine chance meeting / accident.
  • Adam Mitchell: the “main” main catalyst character who loses his daughter in a tragic accident involving a drunk driver. This event causes him to refocus on what it means to be a good father in general, and to his ever-distant son.
  • Nathan Hayes: the first man introduced in the story, and the image of what a good dad entails: being a protector, provider, partner, and teacher, to name a few attributes. His main issue, however, is that he did not forgive his own father for being an absentee dad. He also faces connecting with his teenage daughter who is ready to date.
  • Shane Fuller: a divorced dad trying to make ends meet, but he goes about that in the wrong way. As in illegally.
  • David Thomson: an unwed dad who struggles with a desire to avoid fatherhood.
  • Javier Martinez: a blue-collar worker who meets Adam when Adam mistakes Javier for someone else with the same name. He is also a good father figure to his kids, and attributes that to his own father.
Took me a minute to write that all out. I didn’t even write the full names in the original Courageous post. Yes. I do re-read my old posts. #cringe

So why read this novel, if the story arcs are the same? Uh-uh, read back a couple of paragraphs. I said they were the same overall.

Now, the thing that makes the novel more special than the book (Can you believe it? Even if the book comes after the movie, the book is still better! lol) is what it adds to it. Courageous was in and of itself an excellent movie, but it was also a long story, even after a few (what I thought were) kinda crucial deleted scenes.

Kendrick Brothers, if you’re reading this, you should release an “Extended Edition” version of your movies.

Even with all its scenes, however, the story now seems kinda disconnected. Well, not really. I’ll explain.

According to the info about the novel, only 20% of it was new writing that wasn’t originally in the movie. That 20% makes a huge difference. It makes a difference in the story, it makes a difference in the connection of the characters, and it makes a difference in the characters themselves. If the Kendrick Brothers had made this, it probably would’ve made a much better movie, which is saying a LOT, considering how good it is already!

However…. I don’t know if I would want it in the movie.

Personally, this movie was probably more heavy-handed in its tone than the Kendrick Brothers were used to. Flywheel was a basic enough movie, and you definitely get goofy vibes among the serious parts. Facing the Giants is just one big feel-good fest. You can pretty much guess every part of the plot (seriously, it’s Remember the Titans, Christian Edition), and who doesn’t like a good game of football, or even the atmosphere there? I’m marginally enthusiastic about football games, but I hardly watch the games themselves. It’s always the atmosphere and community. Fireproof was probably the first real drama they did, and even that was very domestic. Aside from one scene involving a train, it’s still light in the heaviness. Even War Room wasn’t nearly as heavily-toned in its showing, and that involved war footage and a scene involving Priscilla Shirer’s character talking to the devil! (I’m unsure of the theological soundness of that, by the way, but it did make a half-decent monologue for someone who’d never been in a movie before.)

Yeah, I know. “Look who’s talking.”

My point is, if Courageous had gone the Randy Alcorn path, it probably would’ve been way heavier and way more severe than what the Kendrick Brothers would have been willing to go. Also, I’m glad the book had a more serious atmosphere than the movie. Personally, when I watch a movie, I don’t want to get weighed down by its atmosphere. I don’t mind a good drama, but there are limits for me. With books, I have a stronger threshold for emotional movement. A movie for me, is a complete escape from reality. A novel, however, transports me to a different reality.

I say all this to say… read the book. No, really. Not necessarily as an evangelical book, not even as a Bible study or father study book. Read it as a novel. It, like The True Meaning of Smekday, will take a couple of days to read, but I assure you, it will be worth the read.

Ciao!

Plugging time! YouTube Page.


What’s your favorite novelization?

Friday, September 29, 2017

My Experience With... Adventures in Wonderland (Alice part 5)

Well, I've finished the majority of the Alice series. Technically, that's all I can say about Alice in Wonderland. How about something based off the original whimsy, and is totally the opposite of the Tim Burton film that'll be sure to have a cult following in 20 years?

Alice series:


TA-DA! TODAY'S THE MYSTERY
BLOG POST! (Plus, virtual high-five to the
first to get where this came from.)


I canNOT express enough how much I love the 1988 movie, but this is my absolute 2nd-favorite Alice-related media. If Disney's movie was a snapshot of the adventures described by Lewis Carroll, then Adventures in Wonderland is the HD .png! Just take a look at this!


Catchy, ain't it?! (Please ignore the 90s cheese.)


Adventures in Wonderland was a kids' show on Disney Channel. It had 100 episodes, and lasted from 1992 to 1995 -- a good run for any children's show. It chronicled the life of young Alice (often shown with her cat, Dinah), who had day-to-day issues that she faced, and learned corresponding lessons every time she escaped reality through her mirror into Wonderland. Each episode was a little different, but always featured a claymation story narrated by the Caterpillar (who doesn't smoke a hookah -- it's a kid's show in the 90s), and LOTS of fun songs.

Characters:

Alice: protagonist. I liked her character, and thought her singing voice was pretty cool.


Dinah: it's a cat. Nothing special for me. She's cute and fluffy, I suppose.



Red Queen: For some reason, she reminded me of my mother...


White Rabbit: Yup, it was the 90s, alright. In-line skates, anyone?


Mad Hatter: I remember asking my Mom why he was wearing lipstick.


March Hare: That makeup was super good! I think I was most impressed with his costume.


Dormouse: Awww, he was so cute! I used to wonder how they fit an actor into the teapot. I was 4. Gimme a break.


Caterpillar: Only slightly frightening to me, which was impressive given the fact that I used to scare easily. (Used to???) Zip it.


Cheshire Cat: I used to find him so hilarious.

Tweedle Dee & Tweedle Dum: My fave characters of all time. I used to think they were the best singers, dancers, and rappers. Never mind the fact that they didn't even look like neighbors, let alone brothers.

This was an amazing show. It had a colorful, diverse set of characters, great musical numbers, and it even subtly taught you fun nuances of the English language! How do you top that?!



I remember being so happy when I got these VHS's, and was hooked ever since. Mom even got to record a few episodes onto some blank VHS's or old tapes that I didn't like. I might still have them somewhere. Let me hit you with the episode "Off the Cuffs" from the "Hare-Raising Magic" VHS for your viewing pleasure.


Basically, it was one of the coolest kids' programs on earth, and I hope to share it with any of my future progeny.

Thank you very much for sticking with me during this 5(ish)-part series! Next week, I'm looking to go back into a previous 5-part series with a new twist. Could a book be better than a movie, even if the movie came out first???? Find out next week on My Experiences With!!! Fridays at Midngith / 9 pm PST!

Okay, that was weird....

Plugging time! YouTube Page.

What old TV show gives you the feels? Has Disney gone down in children's show quality? Is there hope for TV in the future?

Friday, September 22, 2017

My Experience With.... Alice in Wonderland (Part 4) -- The OTHER "Disney" Version

GURSHFGHWOJAWIFJD.

Here we go.


The first time I heard about this, everything just seemed... wrong. So wrong.

I was a little excited for a few of the actors, though, namely Johnny Depp, Helena Bonham Carter, and Anne "I Was Born to Be a Fairytale Character" Hathaway. So I decided to give it the benefit of the doubt, and figured that this went to the darker side of a dream, the kind of dream that isn't quite a nightmare, but a few more scares will have you seriously re-doubting yourself.

The movie was beyond disappointing for me, at first, mainly because Alice was a grown-up woman, who thought (and understandably so) that Wonderland was a dream. She's involved with all the blandness (no, seriously, look at the scenery) of her reality and it all gets interrupted when -- what else -- a white rabbit catches her eye. Deja vous, right?

Oh, and can someone change the title
to Alice in Underland? Yeah, it's "Underland,"
not "Wonderland." (WHY????)

In the original Disney version of this film (yes, this one IS a Disney version directed by Tim Burton), I mentioned that they combined the best of both of the original novels... here, they take the worst parts, age them in brine, and dress it up in goth clothes.

The whole story centers on Alice's coming of age plus fulfilling a Frabjous Day prophecy. It's that dull. While the concept itself sounds pretty cool, I think that this would be better suited in fan fiction.

I think that seems to be the case with a lot of movies these days, in a world that's dying for original content. If this were a game in a separate franchise, I might think it's cool. It's almost like that Twisted Fairytale spot-the-difference game with Goldilocks and the 3(?) Bears. It creeped me out, but it was a fresh take on a lower playing field. Even the story taking place in "Underland," is not that terrible of a concept, if it were not Disney or Tim Burton. Plus, it seemed very dark and structured for something that was supposed to be like a dreamland.

If you do watch this, try to watch without thinking of the original story, and pretend it's someone's fanfiction that got waaaaaaaaaaay too much funding.


Peace!

Plugging time! YouTube Page.

What's your take on these revamped classic stories?

My Experience With... Going to a Salon (Natural Hair Journey part 2)

Over 5 years ago, I decided to start a blog when I had a terrible situation regarding Wen hair products. It isn't my first hair horror ...